The Legal Complexities of Esports
The Legal Complexities of Esports: Copyright, Broadcasting, and Regulatory Gaps
The rapid development of media in the digital age, from established forms such as movies and music to emerging industries like esports and fantasy sports, has created unique legal obstacles, making copyright issues more critical than ever. Today, copyright law intersects with sophisticated technology and cutting-edge commercial models, demanding cautious handling. A prominent example that is commonly at the centre of these legal disputes is esports. The intersection of copyright law in esports industry reveals specific legal challenges, some prominent issues revolving around ownership and regulatory frameworks. This article explores the legal complexities resulting from the growing sectors by looking at copyright issues in the context of Esport and providing solutions based on best practices reflected in various jurisdictions.
Navigating Ownership and Control: Electronic sports, commonly known as "esports," are a variety of competitive video game competitions that are quickly gaining attraction globally, with it being the sixth largest market globally for games. This sector continues to thrive with around 40% year-on-year growth. In contrast to traditional sports, where not one organisation "owns" the sport, game developers in esports are granted broad copyrights over their creations. This poses unique difficulties as game developers have the sole authority to permit or prohibit the usage of their games in competitions, broadcasts, and sales. Consequently, in order to prevent copyright violations, stakeholders such as media distrubtors, players, and organisers need to acquire licenses from developers. The developers' control over intellectual property creates not only licensing complexities but also challenges in enforcing broadcasting rights and maintaining regulatory consistency across regions.
Some jurisdictions have developed strong copyright systems to handle these issues to guarantee the preservation and exploitation of intellectual works in the digital age, ex, EU member states harmonise their copyright laws under Directive 2001/29/EC, also known as the Copyright Directive. The exclusive authority to permit or forbid any public communication of their works, including digital transmissions such as streaming and broadcasting, is granted to authors and rightsholders by Article 3 of the Directive. This clause firmly in place in nations like Germany, strengthens intellectual property protection by ensuring that authors and rightsholders have control over the public distribution of their creations. It also provides a clear framework for obtaining necessary authorisations. By strengthening intellectual property protection in the digital sphere, the article promotes rightsholders to take action against unlawful streaming. The Directive supports the expansion of esport by giving rightsholders the ability to take action against illegal streaming and fostering a fair and sustainable online environment
Broadcasting Rights and Unauthorised Streaming A significant challenge in esports is enforcing broadcasting rights, as many tournaments are streamed online via platforms such as Twitch. Unauthorised streaming violates developers' copyrights and deprives organisers and developers of revenue. China, for instance, has taken proactive measures to combat unapproved streaming through their 2010 Copyright Law with recent amendments in 2021. The country mandates platforms to block infringing content and imposes penalties on violators. This robust framework sets a strong example for other jurisdictions grappling with piracy in esports. This strategy sets a solid example for other governments addressing internet piracy issues in esports.
Regulatory Gaps in Governance A substantial issue facing the esports sector is the absence of regulation and standards in events. In traditional sports, the regulation of a given sport can be implemented by a centralised, international organisation. The publisher of a game is the owner of the game in the industry ecosystem; however, the person in charge of the esports event can also oversee the rules of the game. Unlike traditional sports, where centralized organizations like FIFA oversee regulations and dispute resolution, esports lacks a single governing body to enforce standards. Although industry groups like the World Esports Association (WESA) and the International Esports Federation (IESF) are working to standardise esports leagues, they haven't had much success thus far, and governance is still in flux. Due to absence of a centralised governance, copyright laws are applied inconsistently among states and competitions.
In contrast, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) of the United States offers a well-defined structure for handling digital copyright concerns. By allowing rightsholders to quickly remove unlicensed content, this methodology has been beneficial in combatting online infringements, especially on platforms like Twitch and YouTube. Through the notice-and-takedown process provided by the DMCA, rightsholders can quickly address infringements, providing a well-defined mechanism for copyright enforcement in the digital realm. Although the DMCA has been beneficial, there are still issues with its jurisdictional restrictions and potential for abuse. A more uniform approach to copyright protection for esport might be achieved by implementing aspects of the DMCA's framework, such as quick content removal and transparent enforcement procedures. However, as esports lack a centralized government structure, regulation is uneven and frequently varies by platform and area
Conclusion and Solution
Managing the nexus between copyright and intellectual property law is essential to the viability of the esports sector as it grows. Using regional best practices can serve as a starting point for a more cohesive worldwide strategy. Some legislations are providing scalable methods for protecting intellectual property, while encouraging collaboration amongst stakeholders like manufacturers, streaming platforms and players.
_____________
1- BIAT Legal. (2023, October 5). Copyright in the digital era: Addressing the challenges and embracing the opportunities of the digital age. Medium. https://biatlegal.medium.com/copyright-in-the-digital-era-addressing-the-challenges-and-embracing-the-opportunities-of-the-599d0e96bdaf
2-Kanellopoulos, Athanasios & Giossos, Yiannis. (2024). Esports. Video games or sports?. RESEARCH IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION SPORT AND HEALTH. 13. 43-52. 10.46733/PESH24131043k.
3- U.S. Copyright Office. (n.d.). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Retrieved from https://www.copyright.gov/dmca/
4- Pausing the Game: Esports Developers’ Copyright Claims to Prevent or Restrict Tournament Play, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (Apr. 13, 2022), https://www.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/2022/04/13/pausing-the-game-esports-developers-copyright-claims-to-prevent-or-restrict-tournament-play/.
5- Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 167/10, 22 June 2001, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2001/29/oj
6- David W. Barnes, "The Copyright Crisis in the Age of Streaming: The Changing Landscape of Digital Media," Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, vol. 20, no. 4, 2018, https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1568&context=jetlaw
7- Sofia Baruzzi, "China Copyright Law Amended: Key Changes," China Briefing, January 4, 2021, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-copyright-law-amended-key-changes/
8- Thomas, A. (2020) A question of (e)Sports: an answer from copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 15(12), pp. 960-975
9- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), "DMCA," https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca.
10-Harvard International Review, "Esports and the Future of Competition, Part 2," accessed January 5, 2025, https://hir.harvard.edu/esports-part-2/.